Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/26/1995
In re Roger S.
Citations
- 338 Md. 385
- 658 A.2d 696
- 1995 Md. LEXIS 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “that the Juvenile Causes Act is to be construed liberally to achieve its purposes,” but “[e]ven a remedial statute should not be construed so broadly as to create the possibility of ‘results that are unreasonable, illogical, or inconsistent with common sense’”
- “Even a remedial statute should not be construed so broadly as to create ... ‘ “results that are unreasonable, illogical or inconsistent with common sense.” ’ ” (citations omitted)
- “Even a remedial statute should not be construed so broadly as to create the possibility of results that are unreasonable, illogical, or inconsistent with common sense.” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-01· cited 91×
- Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-27· cited 48×
- Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-14· cited 46×
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-02· cited 32×
- Miller v. RatnerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-07· cited 21×
- Williams v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-09-02· cited 20×
- Son v. Margolius, Mallios, Davis, Rider & TomarCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-26· cited 18×
- In re Ryan W.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-26· cited 14×
- Witt v. RistainoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-04· cited 12×
- Gallaudet University v. National Society of the Daughters of the American RevolutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-04· cited 10×
- West Clark Community Schools v. H.L.K.Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 10×
- Chase v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-03-02· cited 9×
- Baltimore County v. Wesley Chapel Bluemount Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-27· cited 8×
- In re: S.F.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-02-03· cited 6×
- Meade v. Shangri-La PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-01-26· cited 5×
- In Re Nicholas B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-08· cited 2×
- In re Lorne S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-25· cited 2×
- West Clark Community Schools v. H.L.K.Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-24
- In re: Z.A., K.P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-03-28
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-09-14· cited 121×
- Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-05· cited 101×
- Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-09· cited 75×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-09-19· cited 74×
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. GaddyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-30· cited 15×
- In Re Darius A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-13· cited 11×
- Oscar F. v. Cty. of Worcester Sch. Comm. of LeicesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-02-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.