In re Ryan W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the juvenile court did 16 not have authority under Maryland law to monitor the allocation of social security benefits by a representative payee
• holding that the Court must weigh the factors to ascertain the sufficiency of the process
• “[S]uch disputes are for 10 resolution within the federal administrative process and subject to further 11 federal judicial review.”
• “[S]uch disputes are for resolution within the federal administrative process and subject to further federal judicial review.”
• “The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights (usually read in pari materia with the federal analogue), prohibits the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”
• “The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights (usually read in pari materia with the federal analogue), prohibits the deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peo in Interest of E.Q
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 515×
• Peace v. Peace
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-05-08· cited 11×
• In Re Adoption/Guardianship of DUSTIN R.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-21· cited 3×
• Zukowski v. Anne Arundel Cnty.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2025-04-24
• State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services; Adam Crum in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Department; Office of Children's Services; Kim Guay, in her Official Capacity a Director of OCS v. Z. C., Through his Next Friend, Lorenz Kaufman, on Behalf of Himself and all Those Similarly Situated, Z.C. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-03-28
• Maryland Attorney General Opinion 100OAG160
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2015-12-28
• Dcpp v. H.V.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2026-06-16

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Charles Dowd Box Co. v. Courtney
  Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 741×
• Tafflin v. Levitt
  Supreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 634×
• Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 563×
• PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 428×
• Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler
  Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 422×
• Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 372×
• Department of Transportation v. Armacost
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-01· cited 96×
• In Re Mark M.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-05· cited 96×
• Donald P. Davis and Maxine Elaine Davis v. Sun Oil Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-06-24· cited 63×
• City of Baltimore Development Corporation v. Carmel Realty Associates
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-03· cited 53×
• Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-14· cited 52×
• Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
  Third Circuit· 2013-08-06· cited 48×
• Astrue v. Capato Ex Rel. B. N. C.
  Supreme Court· 2012-05-21· cited 47×
• Bates v. Northwestern Human Services, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2006-12-11· cited 45×
• Grace Thru Faith v. Caldwell
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-10-09· cited 41×
• R.A. Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors' Alert, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-26· cited 40×
• In re the Estate of Kummer
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-04-04· cited 38×
• In Re Franklin P.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-18· cited 36×
• Figgins v. Cochrane
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-02-15· cited 36×