Skip to main content
· 12/6/1991

In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-8287

Citations

  • 828 P.2d 1245
  • 171 Ariz. 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the record supported the court's active efforts finding because \rehabilitative programs repeatedly were offered . . . yet . . . [the mother] did not take advantage of the programs\
  • stating that § 1912(f) imposes requirements “in addition to meeting the Arizona requirement that parental rights may only be terminated for a number of stated reasons”
  • affirming the trial court’s decision to terminate biological mother’s parental rights based upon the standard of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt
  • “A trial court properly may consider an Indian child’s best interests when deciding whether to transfer a custody proceeding to tribal court.”
  • “A trial court properly may consider an Indian child’s best interests when deciding whether to transfer a custody proceeding to tribal court.”
  • “[T]he juvenile court will be deemed to have made every finding necessary to support the judgement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Jacobson, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.