In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The discovery rule is not a tool that plaintiffs may employ at-will to evade the statute of limitations. Instead, it is a doctrine with a limited reach, and its tolling benefit ends once a plaintiff discovers her injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re Niaspan Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-09-05· cited 62×

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
• Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2005-05-09· cited 667×
• Lorenz v. CSX Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1993-08-06· cited 397×
• Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of America
  Third Circuit· 2006-01-13· cited 384×
• Victor Zavala v. Wal Mart Stores Inc
  Third Circuit· 2012-08-09· cited 237×
• Pero's Steak and Spaghetti House v. Lee
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 186×
• Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 154×
• Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 143×
• Gaither v. City Hospital, Inc.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1997-02-24· cited 141×
• Charles Spence v. Esab Grp Inc
  Third Circuit· 2010-10-18· cited 126×
• Summerhill v. Terminix, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-03-24· cited 88×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2000-10-17· cited 88×
• Patsos v. First Albany Corp.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-02-05· cited 87×
• Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Detroit
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2005-02-16· cited 84×
• Siragusa v. Brown
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 66×
• Butler v. Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, Inc.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-04-25· cited 66×
• Anson v. American Motors Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-03-31· cited 63×
• Bonin v. Vannaman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-12-20· cited 63×
• William J. Davis, Inc. v. Young
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-03-19· cited 62×