Skip to main content
· 12/20/1996

Bonin v. Vannaman

Citations

  • 929 P.2d 754
  • 261 Kan. 199
  • 1996 Kan. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that breach of a professional duty “by a physician is malpractice” and “an action for damages against a hospital for negligence . . . sounds in tort” and this is true “even though there was a contract between the parties”
  • “if a minor has a cause of action, it must be pursued by a guardian”
  • statute of repose abrogating minor’s right of action for injuries before their discovery implicates Section 18
  • affordable and available malpractice insurance for doctors and the continued availa bility of health care in Kansas are legitimate state interests
  • “Under the doctrine of fraudulent concealment, the statute of limitations ... does not start to run until the plaintiff discovers the fraud[.]”
  • while alleged conduct fulfilled all elements of fraud, conduct was also proscribed by duty imposed by law; breach of duty is malpractice and action for damages is one in tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abbott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.