Skip to main content
· 3/24/2011

Summerhill v. Terminix, Inc.

Citations

  • 637 F.3d 877
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5998
  • 2011 WL 1045562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Arkansas state law federal procedural law in diversity case to determine if the statute of limitations was equitably tolled
  • “Therefore, it is Summerhill’s burden to plead, with particularity, facts to support his claim that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment tolls applicable statutes of limitations.”
  • “Under Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard, allegations of fraud, including fraudulent concealment for tolling purposes, must be pleaded with particularity.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.