N.D. Georgia· 9/13/2006
In Re Parker
Citations
- 351 B.R. 790
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2236
- 2006 WL 2642119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the debtor waived the argument of ineligibility because he pursued and acquired § 109(h)(3
- estopping debtor from demanding dismissal based upon failure to complete credit counseling
- once a petition is filed, the bankruptcy 7 court has authority to determine debtor's eligibility and retains 8 jurisdiction even over cases commenced by an ineligible debtor
- automatic dismissal under Section 521(i)(1) “would not 9 require notice and a hearing. Rather, it is a determination that 10 the court can make with no notice to any party in interest and no 11 hearing of any nature.”
- the requirements of Section 109 are waivable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mary Grace Diehl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wirum v. Warren (In Re Warren)Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-18· cited 61×
- Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir)Sixth Circuit· 2010-08-05· cited 53×
- Mendez v. Salven (In Re Mendez)Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-28· cited 48×
- Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In Re Acosta-Rivera)First Circuit· 2009-02-19· cited 39×
- In Re FiorilloD. Massachusetts· 2011-06-24· cited 13×
- In Re CrawfordD. New Mexico· 2009-12-14· cited 12×
- In Re HallW.D. Texas· 2007-04-23· cited 12×
- In Re SpencerDistrict of Columbia· 2008-05-13· cited 11×
- In Re TimmermanN.D. Iowa· 2007-12-10· cited 11×
- Sandra Slater v. United States Steel CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2016-02-24· cited 11×
- In Re ManaladC.D. California· 2007-01-25· cited 10×
- eCast Settlement Corp. v. May (In Re May)W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-01-28· cited 10×
- In Re LillieforsE.D. Virginia· 2007-10-03· cited 8×
- In Re Tay-KwamyaS.D. New York· 2007-04-23· cited 8×
- In Re VollmerE.D. Virginia· 2007-03-15· cited 8×
- Soto v. Doral Bank (In re Soto)First Circuit· 2013-05-08· cited 7×
- In Re BrickeyN.D. New York· 2007-03-01· cited 4×
- Rivera v. MirandaD. Puerto Rico· 2007-10-12· cited 4×
- In Re FalconeD. Massachusetts· 2007-05-31· cited 4×
- In Re BliekD. South Carolina· 2011-03-08· cited 4×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 1,043×
- Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyThird Circuit· 1953-04-14· cited 484×
- William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySixth Circuit· 1982-10-18· cited 411×
- Grady Allen v. Zurich Insurance CompanyFourth Circuit· 1982-01-08· cited 309×
- In the Matter of Thomas v. Cassidy, Debtor-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1990-02-05· cited 280×
- Barger v. City of Cartersville, GAEleventh Circuit· 2003-10-28· cited 182×
- In the Matter of Patsy D. Phillips, A/K/A D/B/A Market Fitness, Creekside Plaza, Second Wind, Debtor. Promenade National Bank v. Patsy D. PhillipsSecond Circuit· 1988-05-06· cited 71×
- In Re George C. MONTGOMERY, Debtor. George C. MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. Norah RYAN, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1994-10-06· cited 39×
- In Re TomcoW.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-02-27· cited 38×
- McCloy v. Silverthorne (In Re McCloy)Fifth Circuit· 2002-07-12· cited 37×
- In Re RossN.D. Georgia· 2006-02-08· cited 37×
- Michael T. Rudd and Jodene M. Rudd v. Kathleen LaughlinEighth Circuit· 1989-01-31· cited 34×
- In Re SeamanE.D. New York· 2006-03-30· cited 31×
- In Re RiosS.D. New York· 2005-12-19· cited 31×
- In Re HubbardS.D. Texas· 2005-11-16· cited 28×
- In Re HessD. Vermont· 2006-08-14· cited 24×
- In Re FawsonD. Utah· 2006-02-21· cited 23×
- In Re: John Samuel Marlar, Debtor, John Samuel Marlar, Debtor-Appellant v. Renee S. Williams, Trustee-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 2005-12-22· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.