In Re Crawford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since Section 109(h) provides that an individual who does not comply with that section “may not be a debtor under this title,” the only way to give meaning to 11 U.S.C. § 109(h) is to dismiss the case or treat it as though it Section 109(h).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Adams v. Zarnel
  Second Circuit· 2010-08-26· cited 147×
• Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir)
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-08-05· cited 53×
• In Re Fiorillo
  D. Massachusetts· 2011-06-24· cited 13×
• In Re Borges
  D. New Mexico· 2010-09-08· cited 6×
• In the Matter of Fortman
  N.D. Indiana· 2011-07-26· cited 2×
• DeHart v. John (In re John)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-06-04· cited 1×
• In re Cashco, Inc.
  D. New Mexico· 2019-02-19· cited 1×
• In re: Louis D. Amir v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-08-05
• Charles Muszynski v. Roberto Roman Valentin
  First Circuit· 2025-03-07

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 1,290×
• K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 1,097×
• Corley v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-06· cited 913×
• Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-16· cited 272×
• Perry v. Commerce Loan Co.
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 176×
• Hedquist v. Fokkena (In Re Hedquist)
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-04-21· cited 36×
• In Re Cleaver
  S.D. Ohio· 2005-11-17· cited 36×
• In Re Parker
  N.D. Georgia· 2006-09-13· cited 34×
• In Re Seaman
  E.D. New York· 2006-03-30· cited 31×
• In Re Rios
  S.D. New York· 2005-12-19· cited 31×
• In Re Hubbard
  S.D. Texas· 2005-11-16· cited 28×
• In Re Hess
  D. Vermont· 2006-08-14· cited 24×
• In Re Mills
  District of Columbia· 2006-04-20· cited 20×
• In Re Salazar
  S.D. Texas· 2006-03-29· cited 18×
• In Re Valdez
  S.D. Florida· 2005-12-13· cited 18×
• In Re Carey
  M.D. Florida· 2006-05-16· cited 16×
• In Re Elmendorf
  S.D. New York· 2006-07-18· cited 16×
• In Re Ruckdaschel
  D. Idaho· 2007-03-20· cited 15×