Skip to main content
· 2/19/2009

Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In Re Acosta-Rivera)

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 8
  • 61 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 653
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3019
  • 105 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 984
  • 2009 WL 400394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he great divide in section 521 is between information that is required and information that is not. The Act allows courts to do the sifting suggested by that divide without rigid adherence to the forty-five-day deadline.”
  • “The amendments to section 521 are part of an abuse-prevention package.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Selya, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.