S.D. New York· 5/2/2011
In Re Optimal U.S. Litigation
Citations
- 813 F. Supp. 2d 351
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46745
- 2011 WL 1676067
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the plaintiffs’ allegations that the purchases “took place in the United States,” coupled with contract notes indicating the purchase occurred in the United States, was sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss
- determining non-signatory defendants to be closely related where they were affiliates of the signatory hired to carry out its contractual obligations
- allowing a non-signatory to bind a signatory where they are “sufficiently close so that the non-party’s enforcement of the forum selection clause is foreseeable by virtue of the relationship between the signatory and the party sought to be bound.”
- plaintiff's “right to sue on these [fraud] claims does not originate from, and therefore ‘arise out of the [agreement],” but rather from the defendants’ “extra-contractual duties” to make accurate representations
- “The term ‘related to’ is typically defined more broadly [than the phrase ‘arising out of’] and is not necessarily tied to the concept of a causal connection.” (quoting Coregis Ins. Co. v. Am. Health Found., Inc., 241 F.3d 123, 128 (2d Cir. 2001)
- “The term ‘related to’ is typically defined more broadly [than the phrase ‘arising out of’] and is not necessarily tied to the concept of a causal connection.” (quoting Coregis Ins. Co. v. Am. Health Found., Inc., 241 F.3d 123, 128 (2d Cir. 2001)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shira A. Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Magi XXI, Inc. v. Stato della Città del VaticanoSecond Circuit· 2013-04-30· cited 142×
- Prospect Funding Holdings, LLC v. VinsonS.D. New York· 2017-06-09· cited 41×
- In Re Optimal U.S. LitigationS.D. New York· 2011-08-26· cited 38×
- Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. ReeveE.D. New York· 2013-02-07· cited 34×
- Recurrent Capital Bridge Fund I, LLC v. ISR Systems & Sensors Corp.S.D. New York· 2012-06-25· cited 31×
- Martinez v. Bloomberg LPS.D. New York· 2012-08-10· cited 30×
- Magi Xxi, Inc. v. Stato Della Città Del VaticanoE.D. New York· 2011-08-24· cited 26×
- In re Optimal U.S. LitigationS.D. New York· 2011-12-21· cited 21×
- In re Optimal U.S. LitigationS.D. New York· 2012-08-10· cited 20×
- Ritani, LLC v. AghjayanS.D. New York· 2013-09-09· cited 18×
- Bowen Engineering, Corp. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.D. Kansas· 2015-01-06· cited 16×
- Solow v. Citigroup, Inc.S.D. New York· 2011-11-22· cited 9×
- Starshinova v. BatratchenkoS.D. New York· 2013-03-15· cited 8×
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.S.D. New York· 2012-08-06· cited 7×
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. A Chicago Convention Center, LLCN.D. Illinois· 2013-08-06· cited 7×
- In re Stillwater Capital Partners Inc. LitigationS.D. New York· 2012-04-03· cited 6×
- In re Optimal U.S. LitigationS.D. New York· 2012-06-04· cited 5×
- Bancroft Life & Casualty, ICC, Ltd. v. LoW.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-10-16· cited 4×
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
- DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Second Circuit· 2010-10-07· cited 1,722×
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanSecond Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 1,243×
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 1,211×
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 1,127×
- Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2002-11-04· cited 951×
- Hayden v. PatersonSecond Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 947×
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Second Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 848×
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 795×
- Sebastian Mangiafico v. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General, John Armstrong, and Theresa Lantz, Docket No. 05-5465-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-12-19· cited 747×
- In Re: Sharp International Corp. & Sharp Sales Corp., Debtors. Sharp International Corp., Debtor-Appellant v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanySecond Circuit· 2005-04-01· cited 473×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPSecond Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 447×
- Phillips v. Audio Active Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-07-24· cited 434×
- Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2010-09-17· cited 417×
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Second Circuit· 1987-04-01· cited 414×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.