Skip to main content
· 4/1/2005

In Re: Sharp International Corp. & Sharp Sales Corp., Debtors. Sharp International Corp., Debtor-Appellant v. State Street Bank and Trust Company

Citations

  • 403 F.3d 43
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 5241
  • 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 146
  • 2005 WL 737482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that damages for “aiding and abetting” breach of fiduciary duty claim need only allege damages against alleged violators of duty
  • noting that “badges of fraud” are “circumstances so commonly associated with fraudulent transfers that their presence gives rise to an inference of intent.”
  • noting that one element of a claim for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty is a fiduciary’s breach of obligations to another
  • noting that \[i]t is hard to locate that concept in a statute in which the issue of intent is irrelevant\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that the aider and abettor must have “actual knowledge” of the “breach by a fiduciary of obligations to another” (quotation marks 6 omitted)
  • explaining that, in antecedent debt context, something more than knowledge of alleged fraud is required to demonstrate lack of good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Jacobs, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.