Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/8/2009
In Re Najasha B.
Citations
- 972 A.2d 845
- 409 Md. 20
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the guidelines for whether the word “shall” is to be interpreted as mandatory or directory
- explaining that “in the absence of a contrary contextual indication, the use of the word ‘shall’ is presumed to have a mandatory meaning . . . and thus denotes an imperative obligation inconsistent with the exercise of discretion” (quoting In re James S., 286 Md. 702, 709 (1980))
- “The broad policy of the CINA Subtitle is to ensure that juvenile courts (and local departments of social services) exercise authority to protect and advance a child’s best interests when court intervention is required.”
- “ ‘in the absence of a contrary contextual indication, the use of the word “shall” is presumed to have a mandatory meaning ... and thus denotes an imperative obligation inconsistent with the exercise of discretion’ ”
- “The broad policy of the CINA Subtitle is to ensure that juvenile courts (and local departments of social services) exercise authority to protect and advance a child’s best interests when court intervention is required.”
- “in the absence of a contrary contextual indication, the use of the word ‘shall’ is presumed to have a mandatory meaning . . . and thus denotes an imperative obligation inconsistent with the exercise of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-01-12· cited 244×
- State v. RoshchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-26· cited 43×
- Haile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-04-25· cited 21×
- BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. v. RosenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-27· cited 18×
- In re: O.P.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-29· cited 11×
- In re: J.R.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-24· cited 10×
- Anne Arundel Cnty. v. 808 BestgateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-07-07· cited 7×
- Bayly Crossing, LLC v. Consumer Protection Division, Office of Attorney GeneralCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-05· cited 6×
- In re: E.R., T.R., J.R., and D.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-08· cited 5×
- In re: T.K.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-07-28· cited 5×
- In re: Adoption/G'ship of B.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-30· cited 4×
- State v. CoaleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-03-31· cited 4×
- In Re The People of the State of Colorado, Petitioner: In the Interest of Minor Child: R.M.P., and Concerning R.P., Respondent:Supreme Court of Colorado· 2025-06-02· cited 4×
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship of DUSTIN R.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-21· cited 3×
- Rosen v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-30· cited 3×
- King v. PfeifferCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-20· cited 1×
- In re: Adoption/G'ship of C.E.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-06
- In re: K.Y.B.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-30
- In re: W.W.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-12-16
- In re: M.H.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-29
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court· 1924-05-12· cited 161×
- In Re Yve S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 139×
- Kushell v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-14· cited 131×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-13· cited 101×
- In Re Mark M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-05· cited 96×
- Vaughn v. HinchySupreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 78×
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-10-07· cited 71×
- In Re James S.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-01-29· cited 59×
- In Re JJIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-01-24· cited 47×
- Ishola v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-04-10· cited 28×
- In Re Justin D.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-08· cited 25×
- ALLEN M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-05-21· cited 21×
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. T97036005Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-15· cited 12×
- People in Interest of REColorado Court of Appeals· 1986-08-28· cited 9×
- In Re Danielle B. & Deon A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-20· cited 9×
Other cases named In Re Najasha B.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.