In re: E.R., T.R., J.R., and D.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the juvenile court could proceed on the “bare bones CINA petition[]” where the detailed factual allegations were sustained against one parent alone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: R.S.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-17· cited 12×
• In re: J.R.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-24· cited 10×
• In re: T.K.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-07-28· cited 5×
• In re: R.S.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• In Re Yve S.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-27· cited 139×
• McDermott v. Dougherty
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-10· cited 83×
• Wagner v. Wagner
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-06· cited 66×
• In Re Najasha B.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-08· cited 31×
• In re Ashley S.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-30· cited 13×
• In re Russell G.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-28· cited 13×