In Re Mohr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While ability to pay is the primary focus for dismissal under § 707(b)’s abuse test, legislative history suggests that Congress did not intend ability to pay to be a primary consideration under § 707(a).”
• “bad faith dismissals should not be taken lightly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Gutierrez
  D. Vermont· 2014-11-04· cited 12×
• In re McVicker
  N.D. Ohio· 2016-02-17· cited 7×
• In Re Rahim
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-05-23· cited 4×
• In re Gamble
  S.D. Texas· 2017-04-06· cited 3×
• Rahim v. Pacifica Loan Four, LLC
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-05-23· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re David G. Zick, Debtor. Industrial Insurance Services, Inc. v. David G. Zick
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-05-03· cited 259×
• In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 151×
• Perniciaro v. Natale (In Re Natale)
  E.D. New York· 1992-02-07· cited 26×
• In Re Thompson
  S.D. Ohio· 1990-07-03· cited 20×
• In Re Marshalek
  N.D. Ohio· 1993-09-13· cited 19×
• In Re McClaskie
  S.D. Ohio· 1988-10-07· cited 14×
• In Re Hatzenbuehler
  N.D. Texas· 2002-08-26· cited 9×
• In Re Mannor
  E.D. Michigan· 1994-12-13· cited 8×
• In Re Martens
  N.D. Ohio· 1994-07-28· cited 7×
• In Re Brown
  N.D. Ohio· 2008-10-23· cited 6×
• In Re Fuson
  S.D. Ohio· 2008-10-24· cited 6×
• In Re Smith
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-02-12· cited 5×
• In Re Weeks
  E.D. Michigan· 2004-03-03· cited 5×
• In Re Davis
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-11-02· cited 4×