In Re Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the schedules, while the starting point in a § 109(e) analysis, are not dispositive and the court should make its own independent determination of the characterization of a claim
• “The classic unliquidated debt - a claim based on tort or quantum meruit - lies at the other end of the spectrum.”
• “ ‘when it appears a debtor did not exercise reasonable diligence or good faith in completing and filing the schedules, the Court may look to other evidence’ ” to determine eligibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Mohr
  S.D. Ohio· 2010-03-15· cited 8×
• In re Bosserman
  N.D. Ohio· 2018-05-09· cited 4×

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. Brennan
  First Circuit· 1996-12-10· cited 896×
• Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.
  First Circuit· 1989-12-01· cited 288×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,021 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larry D. Blavin, D/B/A Providence Investment Advisory
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-04-30· cited 196×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,813 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ratilal K. Patel
  Second Circuit· 1995-07-24· cited 153×
• In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 151×
• In the Matter of Frank E. KNIGHT, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1995-05-03· cited 83×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Moran
  S.D. New York· 1996-11-01· cited 75×
• United States v. Verdunn
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 69×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 1997-12-03· cited 54×
• Matter of Belt
  N.D. Indiana· 1989-08-28· cited 39×
• Matter of McGovern
  N.D. Indiana· 1990-01-26· cited 38×
• In Re Fostvedt
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-07-27· cited 36×
• In Re Pulliam
  N.D. Texas· 1988-06-21· cited 31×
• De Jounghe v. Mender (In Re De Jounghe)
  First Circuit· 2005-12-12· cited 31×
• Matter of Redburn
  W.D. Michigan· 1996-02-29· cited 24×
• United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Svoboda
  S.D. New York· 2006-01-03· cited 24×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lybrand
  S.D. New York· 2003-09-11· cited 22×
• In Re Pike
  S.D. Ohio· 2001-02-09· cited 18×
• In Re Baird
  M.D. Florida· 1999-01-07· cited 16×
• In Re Clark
  D. Colorado· 1988-10-14· cited 13×