Skip to main content
· 9/13/1993

In Re Marshalek

Citations

  • 158 B.R. 704
  • 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1315
  • 1993 WL 366629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “volition is essential” to a classification as consumer debt in finding that a vehicular accident judgment was not consumer debt under Chapter 7
  • stating that “volition is essential” Fair Labor Standards Act provision to interpret language in to a classification as consumer debt in finding that a vehicular the Age Discrimination in Employment Act because Congress accident judgment was not consumer debt under Chapter 7
  • “a judgment resulting from a vehicular accident, per se, is not a “consumer debt,” as that term is defined under the Code”
  • “The profit motive test is normally applied to cases involving expenditures.... An inability to classify a particular debt as a business debt does not automatically relegate it to the status of consumer debt.”
  • “The profit motive test is normally applied to cases involving expenditures.... An inability to classify a particular debt as a business debt does not automatically relegate it to the status of a consumer debt.”
  • “Implicit in the Code’s definition of consumer debt is the element of volition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph Baxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.