Skip to main content
· 2/7/1992

Perniciaro v. Natale (In Re Natale)

Citations

  • 136 B.R. 344
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 162
  • 1992 WL 20725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Parsing through the rambling, confusing and often irrelevant allegations, it seems that the essential thrust of the second cause of action is Plaintiff’s contention that the Debtor’s bankruptcy filing constitutes a substantial abuse of the provisions of Chapter 7”
  • creditor as party in interest has no standing under § 707(b)
  • debtor omitted two annuities worth an aggregate of $2,000.00

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jerome Feller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.