· 2/7/1992
Perniciaro v. Natale (In Re Natale)
Citations
- 136 B.R. 344
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 162
- 1992 WL 20725
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Parsing through the rambling, confusing and often irrelevant allegations, it seems that the essential thrust of the second cause of action is Plaintiff’s contention that the Debtor’s bankruptcy filing constitutes a substantial abuse of the provisions of Chapter 7”
- creditor as party in interest has no standing under § 707(b)
- debtor omitted two annuities worth an aggregate of $2,000.00
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jerome Feller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.