People v. Platt
Citations
- 67 Cal. 21
- 7 P. 1
- 1885 Cal. LEXIS 529
Syllabus
<p>Pebjuby— Insolvency—False Vebification—Omission or Pbobeety fbom Schedule.—A petitioner in insolvency is guilty of perjury in verifying his petition, schedule, and inventory in the form and manner prescribed by the Insolvent Act of April 16, 1880, if he wilfully omits from his schedule any of his property. The provision in the insolvent act making such omission a misdemeanor does not affect the statute against perjury, to.—Infobmation—Descbibtion of Pbopebty Omitted.—The information described the property alleged to have been omitted from the schedule as “ consisting among other things of diamonds, watches, jewelry, money, and other personal effects belonging to him and his estate.” Meld, that the description was sufficiently definite and certain.</p>
Judges: Sharpstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-03-25· cited 35×
- Liguori v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-08-29· cited 16×
- DIGLIO EX REL. DIGLIO v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1956-02-14· cited 15×
- Parker v. ZanghiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-05-09· cited 15×
- D'AGOSTINO v. Reliance Picture Frame Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-05-31· cited 3×
- Day v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1980-02-15
- Bellsouth BSE v. Tennessee Reg. AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2003-02-18
- Scott Hampe v. Charles Gabus Motors, Inc., d/b/a Toyota of Des Moines, and Gadimina Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Mid-Iowa Occupational TestingSupreme Court of Iowa· 2025-04-11
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.