Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 7/8/1997

In Re Meyer

Citations

  • 211 B.R. 203
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1126
  • 1997 WL 416476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the debtor’s watch purchased for $30 served both a utilitarian and decorative purpose and could be exempted under Virginia’s exemption for “wearing apparel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephen S. Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Meyer

83 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.