Customs and Patent Appeals· 9/16/1982
In re Meyer
Citations
- 688 F.2d 789
- 215 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 193
- 1982 CCPA LEXIS 103
Judges: Baldwin, Markey, Miller, Nies, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2011-08-16· cited 200×
- In Re BilskiFederal Circuit· 2008-10-30· cited 198×
- In Re Donaldson Company, IncFederal Circuit· 1994-02-14· cited 189×
- In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. LarsenFederal Circuit· 1994-07-29· cited 101×
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 76×
- In Re ComiskeyFederal Circuit· 2009-01-13· cited 62×
- In Re Ralph R. Grams and Dennis C. LezotteFederal Circuit· 1989-11-03· cited 39×
- Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix CorporationFederal Circuit· 1992-05-05· cited 37×
- In Re Max A. GulackFederal Circuit· 1983-03-30· cited 33×
- Messerschmidt v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1993-07-30· cited 29×
- In Re Rex D. Schrader and Eugene D. KlingamanFederal Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 28×
- In Re ComiskeyFederal Circuit· 2007-09-20· cited 26×
- In Re Hiroyuki Iwahashi, Yoshiki Nishioka and Mitsuhiro HakaridaniFederal Circuit· 1989-11-07· cited 19×
- In Re Thomas P.H. Warmerdam and Bernard J.H. VerwerFederal Circuit· 1994-08-11· cited 18×
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeS.D. New York· 2010-04-05· cited 12×
- Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SAD.C. Circuit· 2013-01-03· cited 7×
- Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-30· cited 6×
- In Re Comiskey [Revised]Federal Circuit· 2009-01-26
- Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SaDistrict of Columbia· 2013-01-03
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 498×
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court· 1972-11-20· cited 442×
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 347×
- Le Roy v. TathamSupreme Court· 1853-01-10· cited 144×
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-08-14· cited 100×
- Eyre v. PotterSupreme Court· 1854-01-10· cited 66×
- In re FreemanCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-03-30· cited 50×
- Rx Data Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Department of Social Services, an Agency of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1982-06-23· cited 41×
- Application of Walter D. Bernhart and William A. FetterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-11-20· cited 39×
- In re RichmanCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-10-06· cited 29×
- In re WalterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1980-03-27· cited 24×
- Lawler v. James H.Supreme Court· 1852-12-28· cited 16×
- In re ReuterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-06-18· cited 14×
- In re de CasteletCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-10-06· cited 13×
- In re PardoCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1982-08-05· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.