Washington Supreme Court· 1/4/2001
In Re Meyer
Citations
- 16 P.3d 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Megan’s Law notification does not infringe any protected liberty interest
- a personal restraint petition may be used to challenge unlawful state action, even if the issues raised are moot at the time of review, where matters of continuing and substantial importance are involved
- a personal restraint petition may be used to challenge unlawful state action, even if the issues raised are moot at the time of review, where matters of continuing and substantial importance are involved
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Talmadge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-18· cited 205×
- Columbia Basin Apartment Ass'n v. City of PascoNinth Circuit· 2001-09-26· cited 113×
- N.L. v. Bethel School DistrictWashington Supreme Court· 2016-09-01· cited 63×
- Hyatt v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-02-21· cited 51×
- LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLCWashington Supreme Court· 2014-07-31· cited 49×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-18· cited 39×
- Born v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 32×
- State v. LittlefairCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-02· cited 25×
- State v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-05· cited 19×
- In Re WaggyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-07· cited 18×
- State v. BergenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-07· cited 13×
- In Re Detention of BergenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-09-24· cited 9×
- In re the Detention of EnrightCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-02-23· cited 5×
- In re the Personal Restraint of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-05-01· cited 5×
- Osborn v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-10· cited 4×
- In Re Personal Restraint of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-07-18· cited 2×
- In re the Personal Restraint of SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-20· cited 2×
- Columbia Basin Apartment Association v. City Of PascoNinth Circuit· 2001-09-26· cited 1×
- In Re SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-20· cited 1×
- State v. WaggyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-07· cited 1×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 9,097×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,877×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,461×
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court· 1971-01-19· cited 1,666×
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 775×
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-25· cited 688×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Third Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 301×
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court· 1972-04-27· cited 266×
- Arthur Cutshall, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Don Sundquist, Govenor of the State of Tennessee, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 255×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-30· cited 255×
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 199×
- Floyd Spruytte v. Richard Walters and Ronald SchinkSixth Circuit· 1985-01-28· cited 196×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
- Doe v. PatakiS.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.