Skip to main content
· 1/19/1994

In Re Hanes

Citations

  • 162 B.R. 733
  • 30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1078
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 33
  • 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 984
  • 1994 WL 14536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, inter alia, that the Supreme Court’s “references in Shumate to the tax code simply acknowledge that the tax code requires, in conjunction with ERISA, pension plans to contain non-alienation provisions”
  • applying Virginia garnishment exemption to debtor’s interest in two non-ERISA retirement plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Bostetter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.