Skip to main content
E.D. Michigan· 4/19/2013

In re Maura

Citations

  • 491 B.R. 493
  • 2013 WL 1730040
  • 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 1684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding deduction for health savings account “impermissibly duplicates” expense claimed for out-of-pocket health care expenses
  • “The Court simply cannot make such a finding and then leave a case to proceed in Chapter 7. That in itself would be an absurd result— finding an abuse but allowing the abuse to continue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.