Pamela A. Dorris v. Charles Absher and Della Absher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• five violations from particular actions of one interception, two disclosures, and two intentional uses of the intercepted content
• “In the present case, the frank nature of the employees’ conversations makes it obvious that they had a subjective expectation of privacy. After all, no reasonable employee would harshly criticize the boss if the employee thought that the boss was listening.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).