Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 1/31/1992

United States v. Steven L. Parson

Citations

  • 955 F.2d 858
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1095
  • 1992 WL 13808

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a burglar of a dwelling risks having to use force if the occupants are home and hear the burglar”
  • holding that defendant's conviction for reckless endangering was a crime of violence under the second prong of the career offender guideline, § 4B1.2(a)(2), because the second prong of that guideline focuses on conduct rather than intent to use force
  • noting that “a burglar of a dwelling risks having to use force if the occupants are home and hear the burglar”
  • indicating that “use of physical force” refers to an intentional act, and that although a drunk driver may risk causing injury, in most cases he does not intend to “use” force to cause this harm
  • suggesting, in dicta, that section 16(b) requires a willingness to risk having to commit a crime of specific intent
  • noting displeasure with the Commission’s broad definition of “crime of violence” which included possible unintentional uses of force when the original congressional definition excluded such crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Alito, Huyett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.