Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that § 10 motions begin a separate proceeding and that venue is not limited to the district of the arbitration
• recognizing that § 10 motions begin a separate proceeding and that venue is not limited to the district of the arbitration
• concluding that hardship from a district court venue transfer that “Congress explicitly attempted to prevent” justified mandamus
• holding that § 9 is permissive concerning venue in any federal district court
• holding that the FAA’s venue provisions are permissive and that a motion to confirm an arbitration award may also be made in any district proper under the general venue statute
• recognizing that under 9 U.S.C. § 10, applications begin a 19 separate proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).