Attorney Grievance Commission v. Korotki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an “increase in fee obtained by an attorney through threats to terminate a representation which the attorney was obliged to continue” will be held invalid
• noting that an \increase in fee obtained by an attorney through threats to terminate a representation which the attorney was obliged to continue\ will be held invalid
• indicating that whether a legal fee violates a disciplinary rule is a question of law
• indicating that whether a legal fee violates a disciplinary rule is a question of law
• indicating that whether legal fee violates disciplinary rule is a question of law
• “The testimony presented to Judge Levitz would support a finding that the customary contingent fee in personal injury cases which are tried is thirty-three and one-third to forty percent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).