Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \forcing arbitrators to explain their award * * * will unjustifiably diminish whatever efficiency the process now achieves\
• “forcing arbitrators to explain their award * * * will unjustifiably diminish whatever efficiency the process now achieves”
• alluding to and distinguishing cases of remand to clarify what issues arbitrators resolved
• “. . . if a ground for the arbitrators’ decision can be inferred from the facts of the case, the award should be confirmed”
• “[T]he Supreme Court has made it clear that 8 there is no general requirement that arbitrators explain the reasons for their award.”
• ‘‘[a]rbitrators . . . need not give their reasons for their results’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).