Court of Appeals of Texas· 6/15/2000
In re M.A.H.
Citations
- 20 S.W.3d 860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that whether application of SORP should be contingent upon juvenile's age or the seriousness of the offense was a question left to the legislature
- declining to apply strict scrutiny where neither juveniles nor sex offenders constituted a suspect class
- declining to apply strict scrutiny where neither juveniles nor sex offenders constituted a suspect class
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cayce, Day, Livingston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crabtree, Mark AlanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-10-31· cited 147×
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2013-07-25· cited 52×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-18· cited 39×
- Turner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-03-20· cited 34×
- Schlittler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-04-27· cited 28×
- In Re Ronnie A.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-08-11· cited 26×
- Dean v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-08· cited 24×
- Craig Reynolds v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2012-08-23· cited 23×
- Doe v. MillerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-27· cited 23×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-02-15· cited 20×
- in the Matter of D.L., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2005-02-23· cited 17×
- Brasfield v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-08-25· cited 15×
- Reyes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-08-29· cited 13×
- Robinson, William Matthew v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-06-27· cited 12×
- Michael Anthony Tristan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-10-25· cited 12×
- Ex Parte ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-12-17· cited 11×
- Aguirre v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-03-04· cited 7×
- Ex Parte ChamberlainTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-30· cited 5×
- in Interest of T.BColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 5×
- Ex parte OdomCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-12-20· cited 4×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 1,031×
- Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 748×
- Sonnier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-10· cited 461×
- Neal v. ShimodaNinth Circuit· 1997-12-11· cited 379×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1996-04-12· cited 365×
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Third Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 301×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 294×
- Arthur Cutshall, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Don Sundquist, Govenor of the State of Tennessee, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 255×
- Russell v. GregoireNinth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 193×
- Doe v. PatakiS.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
- Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-02-23· cited 122×
- HL Farm Corp. v. SelfTexas Supreme Court· 1994-05-11· cited 67×
- City of Sherman v. HenryTexas Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 56×
- Lanni v. EnglerE.D. Michigan· 1998-02-13· cited 46×
- Alford v. City of DallasTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-08-20· cited 41×
- City of Irving v. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport BoardCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-04-13· cited 37×
- Odak v. Arlington Memorial Hospital FoundationCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-19· cited 25×
Other cases named In re M.A.H.
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re MAHTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-10-16· cited 6×
- In re M.A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-24· cited 4×
- In Re MahCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2008-07-16
- In Re MAHCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-06-15
- In Re MAHTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-06-12
- In Re MahCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11
- In Re MahTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2012-05-16
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.