Skip to main content

In re M.A.H.

Citations

  • 20 S.W.3d 860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whether application of SORP should be contingent upon juvenile's age or the seriousness of the offense was a question left to the legislature
  • declining to apply strict scrutiny where neither juveniles nor sex offenders constituted a suspect class
  • declining to apply strict scrutiny where neither juveniles nor sex offenders constituted a suspect class

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Day, Livingston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re M.A.H.

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.