Roger J. Au & Son, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance (In Re Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Canon Nine does not require the court to find actual evidence of ethical violations
• attorney simultaneously representing debtor corporation and its sole shareholder disqualified under Code of Professional Responsibility for creating appearance of impropriety
• disqualification of debtor’s counsel warranted based on counsel’s performance of legal services for both debtor and debtor’s sole shareholder which related to sole shareholder’s personal guarantee of corporate debt
• This Code was adopted, Congress embraced a similar definition of section “appears broad enough to include anyone who in the “disinterest.” See 11 U.S.C. § 101(14)(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).