Skip to main content

In Re Lear Corp. Shareholder Litigation

Citations

  • 926 A.2d 94
  • 2007 Del. Ch. LEXIS 88
  • 2007 WL 1732588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • criticizing special committee because it failed to chaperone conflicted CEO’s negotiations with the buyer and failed to provide “more assurance that [the CEO] would take a tough line and avoid inappropriate discussions that would taint the process.”
  • denying preliminary junction because the court was “not persuaded that the Special Committee’s less-than-ideal approach to the price negotiations with [the buyer] makes it likely that the plaintiffs, after a trial, will be able to demonstrate a Revlon breach”
  • issuing a preliminary injunction where the CEO, “while negotiating the merger, had powerful interests to agree to a price and terms suboptimal for public investors so long as the resulting deal” yielded certain benefits, including “allow[ing] him to promptly liquidate his equity holdings”
  • Klein expressing his interest in RBC “shutting the door on [potential buyers] and their willingness to look at [Norcraft]”
  • (“[A] reasonable stockholder would want to know an important economic motivation of the negotiator . . . when that motivation could rationally lead that negotiator to favor a deal at a less than optimal price . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.