Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “uncoerced, informed stockholder vote is outcome-determinative, even if Revlon applied to the merger”
• holding that an “uncoerced, informed stockholder vote is outcome-determinative, even if Revlon applied to the merger”
• holding that an “uncoerced, informed stockholder vote is outcome- determinative, even if Revlon applied to the merger”
• holding that an “uncoerced, informed stockholder vote is outcome-determinative, even if Revlon applied to the merger”
• holding that the business judgment rule is the standard of review when a transaction is approved by a majority of disinterested, uncoerced fully informed stockholders
• holding that business judgment review is appropriate when a transaction not subject to entire fairness is approved by disinterested stockholders in a fully informed, uncoerced vote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).