In Re Toys\ R\ US, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether an investment bankers role in providing stapled financing created a conflict of interest that merited injunctive relief
• declining to enjoin merger with no-shop provision and temporally limited match rights
• closely scrutinizing whether an investment banker's role in providing staple financing created a conflict of interest that tainted board process and merited injunctive relief
• “CT]he bottom line is that the public shareholders will have an opportunity Q to reject the merger if they do not think the price is high enough in light of the Company's standalone value and other options.”
• ”[T]he bottom line is that the public shareholders will have an opportunity [ ] to reject the merger if they do not think the price is high enough in light of the Company’s stand-alone value and other options.”
• ”[T]he bottom line is that the public shareholders will have an opportunity ... to reject the merger if they do not think the price is high enough in light of the Company’s stand-alone value and other options.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).