California Court of Appeal· 9/6/1991
In Re Kahlen W.
Citations
- 233 Cal. App. 3d 1414
- 285 Cal. Rptr. 507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Notice is mandatory, regardless of how late in the proceedings a child’s possible Indian heritage is uncovered.”
- wherein the respondent mother asserted she was a member of an Indian tribe and asked for additional time to await the tribe’s determination
- The child's status as an Indian need not be conclusive.
- where the respondent did not allege she was a member of the Miwok Tribe until after the proceedings had already begun, the court held that notice is mandatory regardless of how late in the proceeding a child's potential eligibility for membership in the tribe is uncovered
- where the respondent did not allege she was a member of the Miwok Tribe until after the proceedings had already begun, the court held that notice is mandatory regardless of how late in the proceeding a child’s potential eligibility for membership in the tribe is uncovered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Franson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Desiree F. v. Daniel F.California Court of Appeal· 2000-09-19· cited 205×
- Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. D.W.California Court of Appeal· 2009-12-15· cited 191×
- San Diego County Heath & Human Services Agency v. Michael B.California Court of Appeal· 2008-06-26· cited 178×
- In Re Mary G.California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-24· cited 158×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. GilfillenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-07· cited 154×
- In Re Dependency of TLGCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-07· cited 151×
- Dwayne P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-10-30· cited 141×
- Sacramento Cnty. Dep't of Child v. J.C. (In re A.W.)California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-08-12· cited 134×
- In Re Marinna J.California Court of Appeal· 2001-07-12· cited 130×
- In Re Levi U.California Court of Appeal· 2000-02-04· cited 122×
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Lydia O.California Court of Appeal· 2017-02-14· cited 117×
- In Re Antoinette S.California Court of Appeal· 2002-12-31· cited 116×
- In Re Jennifer A.California Court of Appeal· 2002-12-11· cited 101×
- In Re SBCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-07-28· cited 95×
- El Dorado County Health & Human Services Agency v. J.S.California Court of Appeal· 2014-10-24· cited 93×
- In Re Nikki R.California Court of Appeal· 2003-02-28· cited 79×
- In Re Alice M.California Court of Appeal· 2008-04-09· cited 70×
- In Re Justin S.California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-21· cited 67×
- In Re Samuel P.California Court of Appeal· 2002-07-02· cited 65×
- In Re Pedro N.California Court of Appeal· 1995-05-26· cited 58×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-12-08· cited 119×
- Matter of Adoption of HallowayUtah Supreme Court· 1986-12-05· cited 114×
- In Re Junious M.California Court of Appeal· 1983-07-11· cited 112×
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-903.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-14· cited 66×
- Matter of Dependency and Neglect of ALSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-14· cited 58×
- State Ex Rel Juvenile Department v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-12-04· cited 54×
- Cynthia W. v. Joseph K.California Court of Appeal· 1990-12-24· cited 52×
- In Re Christina A.California Court of Appeal· 1989-08-31· cited 41×
- In the Interest of H.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1986-12-11· cited 41×
- Dennis H. v. Michael S.California Court of Appeal· 1991-04-17· cited 30×
- In re the Dependency & Neglect of N.A.H.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 30×
- In Re Baby Girl A.California Court of Appeal· 1991-06-07· cited 17×
- In re S.Z.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-10-20· cited 13×
- Stanislaus County Department of Social Services v. Kathleen D.California Court of Appeal· 1991-09-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.