In re S.Z.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under ICWA, objection by either parent will keep jurisdiction in state court
• trial court erred when it transferred jurisdiction despite parent’s knowing and voluntary veto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Kahlen W.
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-09-06· cited 138×
• In Re Junious M.
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-07-11· cited 112×
• In the Interest of J.W.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1993-02-02· cited 29×
• D.J.C. v. P.D.C.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-02-27· cited 22×
• In the Interest of D.M.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-07-28· cited 16×
• In Re Larissa G.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-03-07· cited 10×
• State, in Interest of Dac
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-02-27· cited 3×
• Matter of SZ
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-10-20· cited 2×
• Department of Social Services of San Francisco v. Diana L.
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-07-11· cited 1×
• Stanislaus County Department of Social Services v. Kathleen D.
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-09-06· cited 1×
• San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Gina L.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-03-07· cited 1×
• Matter of J.B., YINC
  Montana Supreme Court· 2025-08-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Adoption of Baby Boy L.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-04-03· cited 160×
• In re M.E.M. Youth in Need of Care
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-11-12· cited 89×
• Matter of Guardianship of DLL & CLL
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 39×
• Gridley v. Engelhart
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 24×