Skip to main content
· 2/4/2000

In Re Levi U.

Citations

  • 92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 648
  • 78 Cal. App. 4th 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding determination of applicability of ICWA can be either express or implied
  • “[T]he lack of any response from [the Bureau of Indian Affairs], and the absence of any communication sent to [the Butte County Children’s Services Division] by a tribe, were tantamount to determinations that the minor was not an ‘Indian child’ within the meaning of the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.