Skip to main content
· 9/19/2000

Desiree F. v. Daniel F.

Citations

  • 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 688
  • 83 Cal. App. 4th 460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying upon a letter concerning a sibling does not satisfy the affirmative duty to inquire regarding the particular child before the court because a determination of tribal membership is made on an individual basis and blood quantum is not determinative
  • relying upon a letter concerning a sibling does not satisfy the affirmative duty to inquire regarding the particular child before the court because a determination of tribal membership is made on an individual basis and blood quantum is not determinative
  • ICWA requires more than showing that social worker was assigned to the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thaxter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.