Federal Circuit· 4/20/1999
In Re Joyce A. Cortright
Citations
- 165 F.3d 1353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Prior art references may be ‘indicative of what all those skilled in the art generally believe a certain term means.’” (quoting Vitronics Corp. v. Conceptronic, Inc., 90 F.3d 1576, 1584 (Fed. Cir. 1996))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Newman, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Process Control Corporation v. V. Hydreclaim Corporation, Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 1999-10-25· cited 119×
- Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-06-16· cited 108×
- In Re American Academy of Science Tech CenterFederal Circuit· 2004-05-13· cited 76×
- Sas Institute, Inc. v. Complementsoft, LLC.Federal Circuit· 2016-06-10· cited 43×
- Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-25· cited 37×
- In Re SkvoreczFederal Circuit· 2009-09-03· cited 35×
- Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Pti Technologies Inc., and Kurabo Industries, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2001-08-07· cited 34×
- In Re Baker Hughes IncorporatedFederal Circuit· 2000-06-14· cited 21×
- In Re Mitchell R. SwartzFederal Circuit· 2000-11-08· cited 11×
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova Inc.D. Delaware· 2007-10-30· cited 7×
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLCD. New Jersey· 2009-12-31· cited 4×
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. SICOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.S.D. Indiana· 2010-03-31· cited 4×
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USAS.D. Indiana· 2009-09-23· cited 4×
- In Re '318 Patent Infringement LitigationD. Delaware· 2008-09-26· cited 4×
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2004-06-04· cited 2×
- ORGANIK KIMYA AS v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANYFederal Circuit· 2017-10-11· cited 1×
- ViiV Healthcare UK Ltd. v. Lupin Ltd.D. Delaware· 2013-12-17· cited 1×
- In Re '318 Patent Infringement LitigationFederal Circuit· 2009-09-25
- Rasmusson v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationFederal Circuit· 2005-06-27
- Patent Category Corp. v. Target Corp.C.D. California· 2008-07-16
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1984-03-19· cited 244×
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-08-11· cited 210×
- Howard A. Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Graphcoat, Inc., News Publishing Company of Framingham, Newspapers of New England, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1983-11-08· cited 189×
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-10-19· cited 162×
- In re OelrichCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-12-10· cited 99×
- In Re Mark A. Vaeck, Wipa Chungjatupornchai and Lee McIntoshFederal Circuit· 1991-10-21· cited 73×
- In Re Raymond G. BondFederal Circuit· 1990-11-01· cited 62×
- In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard KeilhauerFederal Circuit· 1995-03-30· cited 58×
- In Re Charles P. Morris, Kenneth L. Pottebaum, and John D. StricklinFederal Circuit· 1997-09-22· cited 54×
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1939-02-27· cited 53×
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-15· cited 46×
- Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksFederal Circuit· 1989-07-05· cited 31×
- Application of Jean Clement Louis FoucheCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-22· cited 22×
- Peter E. Cross v. Kinji IizukaFederal Circuit· 1985-01-28· cited 20×
- In Re Karl Ziegler and Heinz MartinFederal Circuit· 1993-06-29· cited 18×
- In re ZurkoFederal Circuit· 1998-05-04· cited 18×
- In Re OberwegerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1940-12-09· cited 17×
- In re BundyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-02-26· cited 9×
- Application of Marcella FerensCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-11-20· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.