Skip to main content
· 9/23/2009

Eli Lilly and Co. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA

Citations

  • 657 F. Supp. 2d 967
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87763
  • 2009 WL 3060227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to take judicial notice post-trial because defendant lacked a meaningful opportunity to respond
  • ″In exploratory drug research, it can be preferable to have a Type I error (false positive) over a Type II error (false negative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sarah Evans Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.