Federal Circuit· 6/16/2015

Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.

Citations

789 F.3d 1292
115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1198
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10081
2015 WL 3747257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that as a general matter, we review the PTAB’s findings of fact for substantial supporting evidence in the record
explaining that the prosecution history of a patent which has returned to the PTO for a second review is relevant to the PTO’s construction of the claims for that patent
noting that even under the broadest-reasonable-interpre- tation standard, prosecution history can matter
noting that even under the broadest-reasonable-interpre- tation standard, prosecution history can matter
noting that the Board Case: 20-1828 Document: 98 Page: 12 Filed: 12/28/2021 12 INTEL CORPORATION v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED may not “construe claims during IPR so broadly that its constructions are unreasonable under general claim con- struction principles”
noting that the Board Case: 20-1828 Document: 98 Page: 12 Filed: 12/28/2021 12 INTEL CORPORATION v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED may not “construe claims during IPR so broadly that its constructions are unreasonable under general claim con- struction principles”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, Lourie, Gilstrap

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.