Skip to main content
W.D. Oklahoma· 9/24/2015

In re Jones

Citations

  • 538 B.R. 844
  • 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3467
  • 2015 WL 5895439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Court concludes there is no per se prohibition on the suggested plan modification. This Court thus respectfully disagrees with the conclusion announced in Nolan and its progeny.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.