Skip to main content
· 3/16/2005

Bank One, NA v. Leuellen (In Re Leuellen)

Citations

  • 322 B.R. 648
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “risk of depreciation of collateral is a risk that a secured creditor always bears”
  • noting that the good faith requirement and the requirement of court approval of a modification upon notice and hearing “provide important checks against debtors indulging their internal ‘whims’ or engaging in the ‘subterfuges’ feared by the Nolan Court.”
  • discussing the mechanisms available to protect the interests of secured creditors
  • “The more persuasive view, however, is that each secured creditor should be considered as a separate class, permitting the debtor to treat each secured creditor individually.”
  • “[Section 1322(b)(8)] contemplates surrender of collateral as a form of payment . . . .”
  • “Debtors who have difficulty making plan payments should be encouraged to reduce expenses, such as by surrendering a vehicle . . .” rather than dismissal, refiling or conversion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.