Threadgill v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Pennsylvania law “requires a quantum of outrageous conduct in addition to that undergirding . . . fraud liability and compensatory damages.”
• finding that plaintiff’s evidence failed to establish a geographic market in part because “customers testified [ ] that they did not limit themselves to such a restricted geographic region”
• noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim requires plaintiff to show a “fraudulent utterance”
• rejecting “an oddly configured” geographic market “stretching 6.36 miles east, 7 miles west, 11.45 miles north and 10 miles south”
• declining to address issues where, “[i]nstead of providing argument with respect to their issues, the plaintiffs merely referred to their pre-and post-trial briefs”
• resolving \antitrust injury\ issue on appeal of denial of motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).