Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 11/15/2000

In Re: Tatum

Citations

  • 233 F.3d 857
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29035
  • 2000 WL 1707765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Before a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion may be filed in district court, the movant must obtain authorization from this court for the district court to consider the movant’s successive § 2255 motion. 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(3)(A), § 2255.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Wiener, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re: Tatum

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.