In Re It Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the top hat plan was unfunded because the assets used to pay the deferred compensation were general assets of the company subject to the claims of its creditors in the event of insolvency
• “Participants’ legal rights to [the trust’s] assets, and to the assets of the Corporation as a whole, are no greater than those of the Corporation’s general, unsecured creditors.”
• finding a rabbi trust to be unfunded
• discussing top hat plans under ERISA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).