Skip to main content
· 3/7/2012

Hurbert v. Cheeks (In Re Cheeks)

Citations

  • 467 B.R. 136
  • 2012 WL 759616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if it could be argued that Trust funds in this case were segregated from CFMC’s general assets, Plaintiff still could not establish any proprietary interest in the Trust’s funds because Plaintiff did not treat the funds as his property for tax purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jack B. Schmetterer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.