· 3/7/2012
Hurbert v. Cheeks (In Re Cheeks)
Citations
- 467 B.R. 136
- 2012 WL 759616
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Even if it could be argued that Trust funds in this case were segregated from CFMC’s general assets, Plaintiff still could not establish any proprietary interest in the Trust’s funds because Plaintiff did not treat the funds as his property for tax purposes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jack B. Schmetterer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.