Guiragoss v. Khoury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a top hat plan exemption requires \some well established basis for designating eligible Plan members as 'high level' employees.\
• declining to find a top hat exemption where, among other things, \[t]here is no clear evidence indicating who was offered enrollment in the Plan\
• finding that a salesclerk is not a high-ranking employee
• declining to find a top hat exemption where employer \cannot even rely on the Plan documents to support their top hat argument because the documents contain no reference to selective member requirements\
• “[N]ot every member of a top hat plan must be highly compensated or in a management position....”
• \A review of the published cases reflects that there is no existing authority that affirms top hat status for a plan representing more than 16% of the total workforce.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).