Goldman Ex Rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the commission is the “ ‘proper entity exclusively empowered to act in the first instance’ ” (quoting Goldman II, 106 Nev. at 41, 787 P.2d at 379)
• stating that burden of proof before commission is clear and convincing evidence
• stating that burden of proof before commission is clear and convincing evidence
• Commission decision to censure, remove or retire is not merely advisory or recommendatory but is of independent force and effect absent perfection of an appeal; constitution does not contemplate this court's de novo or independent review of factual findings of Commission on appeal
• Commission decision to censure, remove or retire is not merely advisory or recommendatory but is of independent force and eifect absent perfection of an appeal; constitution does not contemplate this court’s de novo or independent review of factual findings of Commission on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).