Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/18/1997
In re Flanagan
Citations
- 240 Conn. 157
- 690 A.2d 865
- 1997 Conn. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, during the investigatory phase, the Due Process Clause does not require notice of the sanc-tionable charges
- noting that, during the investigatory phase, the Due Process Clause does not require notice of the sanctionable charges
- explaining that there exists no right during the investigatory stage to notice of the charges or to limit the investigation and charges to only those set forth in the complaint
- majority rule is that due process requirements do not attach to disciplinary proceedings during the investigatory phase
- judge disciplined for engaging in a consensual affair with a married court reporter assigned to his courtroom
- judge disciplined for engaging in a consensual affair with a married court reporter assigned to his courtroom
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Konover v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 86×
- Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-16· cited 74×
- In Re QuirkSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1997-12-12· cited 68×
- In Re BarrTexas Supreme Court· 1999-03-01· cited 64×
- Abington Ltd. Partnership v. HeubleinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-09-08· cited 47×
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-29· cited 23×
- State v. SolekSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-12· cited 18×
- Burton v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-11-14· cited 15×
- Daniels v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-10· cited 15×
- In Re: Disciplinary Matter of Michael Robert FletcherEighth Circuit· 2005-09-23· cited 12×
- In Re the Inquiry Concerning GerardSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-07-05· cited 11×
- In Re CrahallaJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-06· cited 10×
- In re DeanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-11· cited 8×
- Flanagan v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-12· cited 8×
- In Re HenleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-05-03· cited 7×
- In The Matter of: Jaymie Godwin Wilfong, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-10-30· cited 6×
- In re Jewelyette M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-03-21· cited 1×
- Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. ZelotesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-08-19
- Jones v. Nev. Comm'n on Jud. DisciplineNevada Supreme Court· 2014-02-27
- In Re: M. Fletcher v.Eighth Circuit· 2005-09-23
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-05-07· cited 2,023×
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-11· cited 365×
- Selling v. RadfordSupreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 254×
- In the Matter of the Petition of SellingSupreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 203×
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-27· cited 203×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 151×
- McCartney v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-09-19· cited 121×
- Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-06-20· cited 118×
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-19· cited 84×
- Matter of SeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-16· cited 80×
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-22· cited 76×
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-08-04· cited 66×
- State v. McClarySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-26· cited 60×
- In the Matter of TroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1973-07-26· cited 55×
- Ryan v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 53×
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BotwickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-06· cited 51×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KaiserWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 47×
- Matyas v. MinckConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-21· cited 42×
- Dodds v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.