Skip to main content
· 7/10/2006

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Meltzer

Citations

  • 440 F. Supp. 2d 179
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46319
  • 2006 WL 1896329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a “plaintiff moving for summary judgment bears a much greater initial burden; it must show that the evidence supporting its claims is so compelling that no reasonable jury could return a verdict for the defendant”
  • rejecting bespeaks caution doctrine on the merits in enforcement action involving promotions of penny stock

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.